Jednak chyba już czas zauważyć, że idzie Pani Wiosna.

Does science have a „beauty” problem? David Orrell, a mathematician and consultant, argues that it does—or, at least, that some of its practitioners are in thrall to ideals involving „elegance,” „symmetry,” and „unity” that are beckoning them down false paths.
(…) Unfortunately, Orrell writes in his new book, Truth or Beauty: Science and the Quest for Order (Yale University Press), „It is easier to claim a theory is beautiful than to show that it actually works, or makes sense.”
(…) Like other critics of string theory and its variants, Orrell argues that it is basically unfalsifiable. If the Large Hadron Collider continues to fail to turn up evidence to support those theories, physicists can always say the problem is that they need an even more colossal collider that would hurl particles at one another at even greater speeds.
(…) Outside of physics, Orrell reframes complaints about „perfect-model syndrome” in aesthetic terms. Classical economists, for instance…

„Is Scientific Truth Always Beautiful?”
Christopher Shea